Kan grammatiske konstruktioner have semantisk prosodi?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Kan grammatiske konstruktioner have semantisk prosodi? / Jensen, Kim Ebensgaard.

I: Ny forskning i grammatik, Bind 2017, Nr. 24, 23.10.2017, s. 62-85.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jensen, KE 2017, 'Kan grammatiske konstruktioner have semantisk prosodi?', Ny forskning i grammatik, bind 2017, nr. 24, s. 62-85. <https://tidsskrift.dk/nfg/article/view/97245/146053>

APA

Jensen, K. E. (2017). Kan grammatiske konstruktioner have semantisk prosodi? Ny forskning i grammatik, 2017(24), 62-85. https://tidsskrift.dk/nfg/article/view/97245/146053

Vancouver

Jensen KE. Kan grammatiske konstruktioner have semantisk prosodi? Ny forskning i grammatik. 2017 okt. 23;2017(24):62-85.

Author

Jensen, Kim Ebensgaard. / Kan grammatiske konstruktioner have semantisk prosodi?. I: Ny forskning i grammatik. 2017 ; Bind 2017, Nr. 24. s. 62-85.

Bibtex

@article{a61e33914f0948e1b6b0d1c3dfa0aef8,
title = "Kan grammatiske konstruktioner have semantisk prosodi?",
abstract = "Drawing on a soft interpretation of the construction-grammatical notion of the lexicon-syntax continuum, this paper explores whether grammatical constructions can be said to display patterns of semantic prosody and discusses ways in which constructional semantic prosody as a theoretical construct would need to defined such that two types of constructional semantic prosody are posed: inner semantic prosody, which applies to collocational fields in schematic positions in a construction, and outer semantic prosody, which applies to collocational fields in the construction's co-text. Two admittedly sketchy and exploratory empirical investigations suggest that inner semantic prosody might be a viable theoretical concept, while outer semantic prosody does not seem to be viable.",
keywords = "Det Humanistiske Fakultet, construction grammar, cognitive lingustics, corpus linguistics, semantic prosody, usage-based language models, usage-based linguistics, usage-based grammar, English language, English grammar",
author = "Jensen, {Kim Ebensgaard}",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
day = "23",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "2017",
pages = "62--85",
journal = "Ny forskning i grammatik",
issn = "1902-1291",
publisher = "Syddansk Universitetsforlag",
number = "24",
note = "null ; Conference date: 27-10-2016 Through 28-10-2016",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kan grammatiske konstruktioner have semantisk prosodi?

AU - Jensen, Kim Ebensgaard

PY - 2017/10/23

Y1 - 2017/10/23

N2 - Drawing on a soft interpretation of the construction-grammatical notion of the lexicon-syntax continuum, this paper explores whether grammatical constructions can be said to display patterns of semantic prosody and discusses ways in which constructional semantic prosody as a theoretical construct would need to defined such that two types of constructional semantic prosody are posed: inner semantic prosody, which applies to collocational fields in schematic positions in a construction, and outer semantic prosody, which applies to collocational fields in the construction's co-text. Two admittedly sketchy and exploratory empirical investigations suggest that inner semantic prosody might be a viable theoretical concept, while outer semantic prosody does not seem to be viable.

AB - Drawing on a soft interpretation of the construction-grammatical notion of the lexicon-syntax continuum, this paper explores whether grammatical constructions can be said to display patterns of semantic prosody and discusses ways in which constructional semantic prosody as a theoretical construct would need to defined such that two types of constructional semantic prosody are posed: inner semantic prosody, which applies to collocational fields in schematic positions in a construction, and outer semantic prosody, which applies to collocational fields in the construction's co-text. Two admittedly sketchy and exploratory empirical investigations suggest that inner semantic prosody might be a viable theoretical concept, while outer semantic prosody does not seem to be viable.

KW - Det Humanistiske Fakultet

KW - construction grammar

KW - cognitive lingustics

KW - corpus linguistics

KW - semantic prosody

KW - usage-based language models

KW - usage-based linguistics

KW - usage-based grammar

KW - English language

KW - English grammar

UR - https://ojs.statsbiblioteket.dk/index.php/nfg

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 2017

SP - 62

EP - 85

JO - Ny forskning i grammatik

JF - Ny forskning i grammatik

SN - 1902-1291

IS - 24

Y2 - 27 October 2016 through 28 October 2016

ER -

ID: 164356107